By Paul Bertrand
December 1, 2014
I recently discovered an example from Freek Vermeulen
from the London Business
School in England . He shares a great example
of a company, or industry with organizational dysfunction, which he refers as collective
inertia.
His personal example begins with him having worked for
a newspaper prior to becoming a professor doing research on strategy and
entrepreneurship. He like many of us, experienced the less favourable
reading pleasure in tight quarters of a subway or outside with any wind, the
broadsheet format of a newspaper can cause. He assumed that the large
format of newspapers were probably because of cost efficiencies. When he
questioned his employer at the time on the format and the pain experienced by
readers, customers, they told him that it is the norm for a reputable newspaper
to be in this format and change would cause loss of sales.
He since discovered a couple of points. First, the
newspapers that made the decision to change to a smaller tabloid format did not
experience loss of revenue, some would even argue a positive impact on the
revenue. Second, he discovered that the reason for the larger format had been
obsolete for over 150 years. His research discovered that in the 18th century a
tax had been implemented in England
based on the number of pages a newspaper would print. Hence the larger format
to avoid tax. In 1855, this method of taxing was eliminated.
I was also reminded this week about the work of Gordon
Stephenson and his monkeys and how it relates to organizations set in their
ways. Please note in the 1950’s the ethic committees were not as prominent as
they are today with animal studies.
Stephenson put four monkeys in his
lab, with a ladder below a hanging banana. Whenever a monkey touched the ladder
to climb for the banana, the monkey and the others get sprayed with cold water.
I’m sure there were a few attempts for the banana with some cold, wet and
pissed-off monkeys before none were making the attempt. Then added is
replacing one of the four monkeys with a newcomer. When the new monkey saw
that banana, he did what most would do, go for it. Interesting is the other
three pounced, attacked and fought the new monkey when he attempted to go on
the ladder for the banana. Just imagine what he was thinking of those three.
Eventually one by one the original monkeys who had
experienced the cold water treatment were replaced, but yet none were ever
allowed or trying for the ladder. Have you ever questioned the bad practices
that are causing some monkeys in your organizations?
If you would like to learn more about
organizational effectiveness and how the solutions at Canadian People
Management can improve your results, visit us at www.cpeoplemi.com
Paul Bertrand is founder of
Canadian People Management Inc. which is based out of Pickering , Ontario .
His company specializes in organizational effectiveness development through
solutions tailored to strengthen his client’s cultures, leadership and teams.
www.cpeoplemi.com

No comments:
Post a Comment